React & Next.js front end
Interfaces built in React and Next.js with server-side and static rendering where each fits — so pages arrive with real content, load fast, and preview correctly in search and social.
We build full-stack web apps on React and Next.js — server-side rendering, typed APIs end to end, Postgres underneath, and performance you can measure. One team owns the front end, the back end and the deploy, so nothing falls in the gap between them.
When one team owns the whole stack and the types run end to end, a change to the API breaks the build instead of breaking in front of a user. That is the entire case for full-stack done properly — fewer seams, fewer "it worked yesterday" surprises, and a codebase that stays fast because someone is measuring it.
Interfaces built in React and Next.js with server-side and static rendering where each fits — so pages arrive with real content, load fast, and preview correctly in search and social.
The API and the client share typed contracts, so if the back end changes a field the front end fails to compile — killing a whole category of runtime bugs before they ship.
A Postgres schema designed to last, not one you rip out in six months — modelled around how your product actually works, with the queries kept fast as it grows.
The flows that would hurt if they broke — auth, payments, the core loop — covered by tests, and speed proven against real numbers instead of a feeling that it seems fast.
We map the app, model the data, and settle the stack decisions that are expensive to change later — with a fixed estimate before any code.
Working software each week in a live environment, typed and tested as it goes, so you steer the build rather than waiting for a launch-day reveal.
Deployed, measured for speed, and handed over with readable code and a schema your team — or the next one — can own outright.
React and Next.js on the front end, typed APIs, and Postgres for data — with server-side rendering where it earns its keep. It is a boring, proven stack on purpose: fast to build, easy to hire around, and it will not be a dead end in two years. We reach for the exciting new thing only when it genuinely beats the safe one.
Yes — SSR and static rendering where each fits. Server rendering means the page arrives with content already in it, so it loads fast and search engines and social previews see real HTML instead of an empty shell. We decide per route what renders on the server, at build time, or on the client, rather than forcing everything through one mode.
Both, as one system — that is the point of full-stack. One team owns the React front end, the API layer, the database and the deployment, so nothing falls in the gap between a front-end shop and a back-end shop pointing at each other. When you already have one side, we build cleanly against it instead of insisting on a rewrite.
Types end to end. The API and the client share typed contracts, so if the back end changes a field, the front end fails to compile instead of failing in front of a user. That one discipline kills a whole category of "it worked yesterday" bugs, and it is why a typed stack is worth the small upfront cost.
Tested for real, and we can show you the runs. We cover the logic that would hurt if it broke — auth, payments, the core flows — and we measure performance against real numbers, not a gut feeling that it "feels fast." A build you cannot verify is a build you are hoping about, and hope is not a deployment strategy.